The Nietzschean Court

And other benefits of the New World Order

                                                                                                Dr. A. H. Krieg

                                                                                                04/06/06

Decisions of the Supreme Court in the late 20^th century smack of Beyond Good and Evil (1886) by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. For those unfamiliar with Nietzsche he was influenced strongly by Schopenhauer’s philosophy. These two men articulated the philosophy that became the major driving force behind 20^th century thought on family, morality, ethics, and community. It also became to be the backbone of Nazi philosophy. The Court has taken their writing very seriously, implementing concepts espoused by them to the detriment of our society and America in general.

A brief explanation of the concepts of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche’s philosophies seem in order. Both of were atheists. A summation of their concept is simple to understand. Nietzsche in particular attacked all Christian concepts particularly those relating to ethics and morals and stated that man must “revaluate all values” that man has “will to power” and “self determination” and that all concepts should be viewed from the position that [he] man is the ultimate arbiter of all matters relating to himself. In more contemporary words what they proposed what was to become humanist. This was then expanded to secular humanism, or the philosophy of the Nazis and the concepts of man and superman, and a direct attack on organized religion.

An overview of the entire cabal of this philosophy is only possible when one understands the desire of its proponents and the universal outcome of their planned desires. The New World Order seeks to control all governments worldwide, and to those ends they have developed a five-pronged attack. The primary first goal of these megalomaniacs is the destruction of the family. To do this they have caused relentless attacks on all churches and five actions to take place independently but in unison. 1) They have increased immigration both legally as well as illegally of individuals who refuse to assimilate into the society to levels now exceeding 12% of the indigenous population. 2) They have begun wars of conquest internationally in order to enhance their global economic control implementing their “free trade” scenario and to remove hundreds of thousands of indigenous people out of the country and engaged in foreign wars, removing about 1% of the total indigenous population overseas. 3) They have instituted laws and statutes that support homosexuality, sodomy, and pornography, all of which further reduces child replacement. 4) They have postulated (wrongly) that the right to murder children is the implicit right of every female even if her husband the father of the child is opposed to the act. Thereby reducing birth rates of Americans to below replacement rates, which has resulted in the murder of about the equivalent of 15% of the total population. 5) The implantation of a concept to destroy the family’s ability to earn a decent living through the enactment of “free trade” legislation whose primary success has been the reduction of income and the elimination of the highest paying blue-collar jobs, resulting in a overall lowering of the standard of living. . The sixth yet to come will be the officially recognized right to murder of the aged through the legalization of euthanasia. The transfer of humanitarian efforts by church, community and family have already been granted to the state, which then becomes the arbiter of all goods and graces replacing church, community and family. This then is the formula for the destruction of societies most important means of cohesion the family and church.

The legislative and executive powers acting in unison have made their considerable contributions to this cause by the enactment of free trade through such as NAFTA, implemented illegally by an Executive Order by the then sitting Pres. B. Clinton (1) and CAFTA, the enactment of WTO, GATT, and other regulatory dictums that favorer large multinational corporations over small and family oriented businesses. These acts that were opposed by over 80% of the population when enacted were nevertheless implemented anyway. And by the declaration of wars based of totally fallacious grounds against countries that refuse to institute the free trade dictums of the empire. The third legislative act has been the refusal to force government bureaucracies to comply with immigration laws [Homeland Security] and the legalization of immigration far beyond any reasonable concepts of volume. These immigration laws have been purposely structured so as to impede West European immigration and instead to foster Central and Latin American immigration of peones’ that are well understood not to integrate into American society. It is imperative to an understanding this issue and to realize that these “new” immigrants represent the dregs of the societies from which they come, unprincipled, mostly illiterate uneducated, laborers. Fourthly they have instituted a world tax by using the American dollar as the “world reserve currency” and then inflating its value by the issuance of fiat species relentlessly. They have removed the dollar value from its traditional link to hard assets (1932 Roosevelt and later Nixon) this process is best described as financial terrorism. It is resulting in the demands of first Iraq and now Iran of payment for their oil in Euros, i.e. it was the cause of our war against Iraq and our soon to be un-announced war against Iran.

This then brings us to the Supreme Court, the third branch of government. The Constitution is very clear on how laws are to be made and who is to make them. Art. 1 Section 1 Paragraph 1 of the constitution clearly states that the making of law is reserved to the legislative branch of government. Article 3 Section 2 paragraph 1 is equally clear on the power of the judicial branch of government, which I assure you is not to make law.

The Justices, at least a majority of them have come up with a concept that allows them to make law. And make no mistake about it they are making law daily and relentlessly. This concept they call “the living constitution” what they mean by this lie, and it is a lie, is that the founders and authors of the constitution believed that all the concepts of the constitution were open for interpretation by the justices based on the norms of the society at any particular point in time. This of course is not the case, and never was. It is a development of the middle to late 20^th century being directly related to the philosophies of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. What this concept does is to negate the entire constitution to irrelevance. It means that the constitution has no founding principals and denotes that it indicates whatever the reader thinks it means. On that basis we have no laws, because they are all fluid, being based on the norms of current society.

A fine example of this is Justice Greenberg’s recent speech to the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which was named “ A decent respect to the opinions of [human] kind”. In that speech while in its beginning she did the best to trash the Declaration if Independence, she stated that justices have the authority to change the constitution-and to use contemporary foreign laws and rulings as inspiration for doing that. Someone – anyone please ask this geriatric to re-read her oath of office, something she probably conveniently forgot at least a decade ago.

This allows the government to rule by terror because no citizen can under these circumstances possibly know what the law actually is and does. The bureaucracy can then implement “selective enforcement’ as a means of terrorizing its citizenry into obedience to the newly ruling clique. Examples of these would be Ruby Ridge, Waco, Martha Stewart and the well-know practices of the IRS.

These actions have resulted in the precipitation of scores of laws impacting our entire society the list is endless but a major act would be school bussing. This issue is certainly not imbedded anywhere in the constitution. The concept of the justices that they were enacting constitutionally required equality issues is specious; furthermore America since implementation of this idiotic law spends more on buses and fuel than on plant, maintenance and equipment. Then in a tortured opinion they reversed the entire equality concept by allowing racial preferences in education, and government contracts, and then to add fuel to the already inflamed position expanded these concepts with requirements of numeric equality in all matters relating to race and gender. It is irrelevant what side of the argument you personally favor none can say with any possible truthfulness that they believe these ideas to be embodied within any of our founding documents or laws.

This then brings us to the courts attack on family. They have been the most effective in this endeavor, far more so than the legislative or executive. Perhaps this is the reason that congress has never once acted to impeach any member of the court in the 20^th century. The list of anti-family actions by the court is by far longer than those taken in the legislative as well as executive branches of government combined. Furthermore through the universality of enforcement have greater impact in changing society rapidly. There is a good reason for this. Supreme Court Justices are immune from direct action by the citizens. They do not hold elective office and are furthermore appointed for life. Short of impeachment, which is virtually impossible (2) there is simply no way to get rid of them. Thus they in their own minds become infallible gods who can do no wrong. Their power is omnipotent. Decisions reached by them directly affecting the family is: Roe vs. Wade 410U.S. 113. (1973) The right of a female to murder her child even if married, without her spouses consent. This decision was made under the guise of the right to privacy of the mother. This assumes Immaculate Conception of all children by females and/or negates the father to inconsequence. Planned Parenthood vs. Danforth 428 U.S. 52,69 (1976) treats the father like a non-entity in the matter of conception having no say in the matter at all. In Planned Parenthood vs. Casey 505 U.S. 833,851 (1992) dealing with contraception the court determined that this right came from “the right to define, ones own concept of existence, of meaning, and the mystery of human life”: Nietzsche would be proud! Justice Scalia referred to this passage as “the passages that ate the rule of law”. From the striking of sodomy laws to the enactment of “don’t ask don’t tell” to making same sex sodomy a constitutional right in Lawrence vs. Texas (2003) in 1947 they concluded that there was a “wall of separation” between church and state even though no such separation is called for in any founding document, and the word separation does not reside in the constitution Everson vs. Board of Ed. every one of these decisions is a stake in the heart of the family, and Christianity.

Attacks by the court on society in general, all relating to personal freedom and community liberty have accelerated markedly in the second half of the 20^th and beginning of the 21^st centuries. These include, Berman vs. Parker (1954) allowing the District of Columbia to seize a perfectly good department store and turn it over to a private developer to redevelop a “blighted” neighborhood that was close by, this lead to the 2005 decision of Kelo vs. New London allowing government to take private property and turn it over to a developer in order to boost tax revenues. Then in 2003 came the McConnell vs. Federal Elections Commission, which upheld the McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance Reform bill that restricts organizational political speech in criticizing any incumbent. Going from the sublime to the ridiculous in Plyer vs. Doe the Supreme Court under the guise of the 14^th amendment (equal protection clause) decided that illegal residents were accorded the protection of the constitution and required states to provide free education and medical services to illegal’s. In 2003 a truly horrible year for the relentless attack on Americans by the court in Grutter vs. Bollinger they decided that the University of Michigan Law School could use race as a means to attain “critical mass” of particular racial groups, in other words excellence was no longer the requirement for law school admittance race was, my son fell to this law. Then in 1995 they attacked the entire constitution and violated the tenth amendment in their ruling to forbid states the right to set term limits for congressional officers. (U.S. Term Limits vs. Thornton.

All these action revert to the change by the court of championing individual rights as they did until 1900 to the implementation of “Group Rights”. A reading of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence and even the Federalist paper clearly indicates that none of the founding documents granted any group rights whatsoever. In fact the primary reason for the immigration movement to America in the 1700’s was that the major European nations had granted group rights to the detriment of all discordant groups or opposes of the ruling clique.

Now you might well ask what does all this have to do with the New World Order and Nietzsche? The plan for the N.W.O. is to come to prominence and rule the world; they must be able to bring a catechistic act to take place. Only in a worldwide revolution or world war will there be sufficient turmoil for the people to accept any solution so long as it brings an end to lawlessness and war. Fourth generation war is today called terrorism. In it the major two protagonists of the Western World in this war has resulted in hostility to the citizens of the nations (America and Britain) by their own governments rather any solution to the problem. Fourth generation war is the intended catalyst to bring about such a high degree of social agitation that the public will concede power to the N.W.O. that will promise and end to the war. Freedoms and liberties have been eliminated across the board. In America the enactment of the Patriot Act alone has resulted in the loss of articles 1,4,5,6,7,8,9, & 10 of the Bill of Rights as well as numerous constitutional provisions including Habeas Corpus.

Everyone with even a modicum of common sense fully understands how to end the terrorist acts by Middle Easterners. This however has been called the third rail of politics in America. The N.W.O. lobbies power over the political processes in Washington in the beginning of the 21^st century is so absolute that no politician dares to say what is in his mind or what the facts of the war are. The mainstream media also under control of the established New World Order who sees to the enforcement of political support of their policies regardless if they are good or bad for America. I will tell you how to eliminate terrorism against the West: Terrorism as constituted at the present time is the result of American and British foreign policy and nothing else. A simple change in our foreign policy and an end to our wars of empire will eliminate all terrorist acts against us while preventing the N.W.O. from attaining their goal of world conquest. .

1)                            Executive orders may not be used to make law the enactment of an international treaty is the making of law. Only Legislative action can make law, in the case of NAFTA it would require congressional approval, something that never happened.

2)                            Impeachment of Supreme Court justices is no longer possible since the 1913 change of the constitution regarding the election of senators by popular vote rather than by state legislative bodies.

Dr. Krieg’s latest books are: VALE the illuminati and its plans for the future