Dr. A. H. Krieg
|
Other considerations aside, I have been reading some old newspapers magazines and essays form the 19th and 20th centuries, and made a, to me startling discovery. One might even say monumental discovery. What I found was that the most important occurrences of those two decades were missing from the journals that purport to keep us informed. Many things that we know took place because of the enactment of law relating there to, seem to have been sucked up in a vacuum of time and space leaving nothing but the implemented change of the act behind.
The occurrence of the passing of the 16th amendment to the constitution supposedly ratified on Feb. 13th 1913, was without any doubt the single most important occurrence of the 19th century, it having the greatest and longest lasting effect on the citizens of the nation. In a review of the year by AP the 16th amendment is granted one column inch of a four page supplement of 1913. The New York Times (Page One) 1851 to 2001 neglects even to mention the 16th amendment. That the implementation of the 16th amendment the so called IRS statute is the most profound act ever made by congress is indisputable. The act changed America from a republic to a centralized federal democracy. The removal of the original 13th amendment during the closing years of the War of Northern Aggression is not noted anyplace. It is in fact, as if it never existed. Had it not been for some researchers who turned up copies of the constitution from before the war we might have been kept in the dark about it. The original 13th dealt with titles (Esq.) among others; prohibiting their use, while at the same time placing some severe restrictions on the legal profession. The 14th amendment, which was illegally made part of the Constitution. That is claimed to have been ratified on July 9th 1868, just after the war is not mentioned either, nor is the fat that it was never ratified and was made law in the absence of legality. The constitution decidedly requires a 2/3rds majority of the states to ratify any change or addition to the constitution; this did not take place in the 14th. At the time there were 37 states in the union; 2/3rds would be 28 states. States who voted for 22, States who voted against 12. States not voting 3. States who withdrew their vote 2. The FRS (Federal Reserve System was also implemented in 1913 and we learn from an article in the NY Times dated Sept. 23 1914, (just a bit after the fact) that the FRS is a private corporation whose stockholders are the largest banks and their foreign affiliates. This corporation has never in its entire history been audited, presented a financial statement, nor been held accountable by any government agency. They control the prime interest rates; the currency is issued at their orders, they control the value of the dollar, and they collect the interest form taxpayers on the national debt. Their collection agent is the IRS. Total research finds one coming up wanting in regards to the FRS, the original NY Times article seems to be the only one in a national publication ever to mention that the FRS is in fact not a governmental agency. They and they alone orchestrated the great depression in order to consolidate their hold of the new smaller banks. An act they repeated in the Clinton administration when they successfully forced over 700 Savings and Loan banks into bankruptcies, thus consolidating their hold on banking. Today they do this through mergers and acquisitions. At the rate banks are consolidation we will be left with very few by the end of this decade. Congress and the media are far from the only culprits in this long travesty of justice. The executive branch has found an entirely new process to change and make law in violation of the constitution Article one paragraph one. Changing a making law by the executive branch (president) is prohibited in the constitution. The use of EO's (Executive Orders) has been used by every president since Washington. However until FDR (Roosevelt) such EO's were used strictly for administrative matters relating to the presidency. Ordering furniture, letterheads, china, or the hiring of staff was the only use of EO's. FDR drastically changed that by issuing more EO's than all the combined presidents that came before him. Furthermore he began the process of making law thought EO's. Since then all presidents of both Republocrats parties have used the process to circumvent congress, the constitution and the people, as well as the judiciary. Through this they have destroyed the original concept of the separation of powers and have made the presidency omnipotent. The most egregious act taken as an EO was Clinton's illegal implementation of a treaty, that he called an agreement, NAFTA. All treaties become part of constitutional law and are law. The enactment of NAFTA by Clinton through an EO, is illegal, and was challenged by the United Steel Workers Union to the Appellate court in Birmingham AL. It was kicked up to the Supreme Court in due time who refused the case sitting their opinion that this was a legislative mattered and that congress had to rule on it. In other words the Supreme Idiots copped out of their responsibility of enforcing the constitution, while a wimpy feminized congress lacks the guts to challenge the executive. Perhaps a more reflective prognostication would be that congress has no interest at all in the constitution or the bill of Rights but only in getting themselves re-elected to their plush jobs and numerous perks. I believe that the aforementioned matters clearly point to a direction, and that America which has been changed from a republic to a democracy is now being changed into an empire. The hallmark of all empires is the direct and indirect rule of outside forces. I do not believe that it is possible to dispute that we are ruling directly and indirectly the majority of the world. Direct rule is in Afghanistan where we have installed an administrator puppet, who can more correctly be called the mayor of Kabul. In Iraq we have installed a Zionist governor who rules. Our indirect rule extends over Korea, Germany, most of Latin America, the Caribbean basin, and through economic pressure the Indian sub continent, the list is endless. The astounding mater however appears to be that our empire is not ruled over by us, but rather by an outside force whose bidding we seem to follow with shocking regularity. It is the Neo-Cons who have taken over not only our government but also the media. Through long planning and the excellent executions of their plans they have finally in 2003 come to control it all. These vile Zionists, who have changed our Christian republic into a shadow to the Zionist state, are as you read in firm control of all the levers of power. Criticism is not tolerated, as numerous patriots languishing in various jails can attest to. America now has the honor of having the largest in-prison population in the world. Anyone who is not able to be convicted of some obscene and altered federal or state statue is firmly vilified by the media. Not even members of congress are except from it. Through the control of the judiciary some trumped up charges are leveled and through control of the courts, prosecutors, and attorneys all is taken care of and a conviction is guaranteed. We can all think of numerous people now so incarcerated. The process of selective enforcement of laws that can not be clearly understood by anyone is the means of their actions. The body of American law in the 21st century is so diverse, convoluted, and in continual flux, as to make the understanding of it impossible. Selective enforcement of laws unknown or not understood by the citizens are used as a control weapon against the electorate. Before we go further we should consider the means by which all this is made possible. For this we must examine the political dialogue and the media who reports on it. In application to both politicians and the media several rules apply. 1) Regardless of the facts in any situation strenuously avoid any discussion of them. 2) Become indignant if anyone brings the true fact to light, then change the venue to some side issue. 3) Reiterate lies as published by others with who you are in accord repeatedly. 4) Create a straw issue that will be easy for you to repudiate 5) Sidetrack real discussion and slander your opponents through the many idioms developed; "right wing, kooks, conspiracy buffs, radicals, militias, racists, religious fanatics, Christian ideologues, and so forth. 6) Strike and disappear; i.e. make any ridiculous attack on your opposition and then walk off before it can be responded to. 7) Question the motives of your opposition, as hidden motives, or special agenda, or bias agenda. 8) Claim expertise on the issue. 9) Faint silence by pretending you do not understand the opposition issues. 10) Paint the issue as one of such complexity that it is insoluble. 11) Demand of the opposition a compete solution to the problem at hand even though you have none. 12) Eliminate the need to reply by removing the evidence. 13) Change the subject. 14) Ignore all evidence and demand such total evidence as is unavailable. 15) Introduce fake manufactured evidence. 16) Create distractions. 17) Install your own experts as referees, and cloak them in the mantle of Judeo/Christianity. 18) Silence your critics by not reporting their actions or evidence. 19) Slander the opposition through falsely linking them with unpopular organizations (Nazis, Skin Heads, conspiracy kooks, etc.) 20) Accuse your opponents by innuendo of any unpopular theme. What these things are is the tools of propaganda. All are used by the political system, by that I mean all the Republocrats, as well as the media. I should be clear to point out that America as well as England both of which have a two party political system do not in fact have any political diversity but have a system to which the members of both parties belong, that has the exact same agenda. All of these 20 principals were used in the build up to the war with Iraq, and by that I mean both wars. From the lies in televised testimony before congress in Gulf one, to the lies of George Bush the lesser in his fabrications of weapons of mass destruction, nuclear arsenals, missile capability, mobile weapons labs, and all the rest. The fact that both political parties in both nations have the same agenda can be demonstrated by the information that in both cases all of the parties without exception supported entrance into the EU, NAFTA, GATT, and WTO. These multi-national treaties and agreements demonstrate the total control of the multi-national corporations over the political scene in both nations. And we certainly know who controls the multi-national business interests, media, and politics, but particularly in the banking sector. Unless you are brain dead you must know what faction Rothschild, Greenspan, Eisner, Bronfman, Pele, Wolfowicz, Lieberman, and Frank belong to. These people are so diabolically perverse that a very large percentage of them hold Israeli passports, while working for the American government and fawning allegiance to our land. |