|
A. H. Krieg 2007
While mainstream and the political right call's it "Judicial Activism" I christen it "Cultural Marxism". As a revisionist historian and author, I know only too well that any opposition to the elitists plan must be well documented to prevent their slanderous diatribe. Judicial activist judges in violation of their oath of office prosecute a singularly destructive of law observance of imprinting on society their own often-false opinions rather than the "Letter of the Law" as is required by the constitution. These megalomaniacs suffer the delusion that their personal opinions are far greater and better than that of our forefathers as provided Constitution and Bill of Rights and existing law. The sad fact is that it is not only judges who follow this path, but also our legislative and executive branches of government. This entire process may be traced to the political left. What I mean by the political left is socialists, communists, new democrats new labor and all the leftist political parties and theoreticians. In this group are among others, the over 60 legislative Democrat members of the American Socialist Party which can be downloaded from the Internet off the DSA homepage. Having been unsuccessful in efforts to establish socialism through the legitimate legislative process they have turned to Cultural Marxism as their chosen means of destroying the (what was a) Republic. The foundations of our Constitution and Bill of Rights are based in our Christian Anglo Saxon heritage. It is exactly those time-valued virtues that are so vehemently opposed by the political left. Our founder had a clear understanding that man is basically evil and requires not only a stern God but also a good foundational legal structure to prevent his going astray. The political left's philosophy on the other hand insists that man is omnipotent and good and that through proper education (naturally by the state) will excel [Secular Humanism]. These fundamental variances are at the heart of the Cultural Marxist debate. Liberal theology in the form of "Secular Humanism" (that the Supreme Court has defined as a religion) is one of the vehicles of the left. Secular Humanism is the atheist philosophy or socialist gospel, which has so dominated political debate since the end of the 19th century. It in crass terms is the belief that man is god and that organized religion and the belief in a deity is old-fashioned superstition. One of the prime pushers of this has been the Federal Council of Churches, which was heavily involved in internationalism one of the communist front issues in the '20s. They later changed their name to the American Council of Churches. In the post WWII era liberal theology and socialism backed away from demanding a socialist state instead demanding programs that could only be administered through socialism. When this also failed to achieve their goal in the allotted short time they turned to the law and the implementation of law to attain their goals. This began in the Wilson administration but culminated in the FDR administration the firs truly socialist presidency of the American state. FDR had a simple administrative management style. He ignored the law, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, delegated no authority to anyone and told no-one what he was up to or what his plans were. When he tried to circumvent the Constitution and the Supreme Court, (which in those days actually meant something) they struck him down. He then tried to stack the court by increasing the number of judges but that fortunately also failed. Eventually he got Justice Frankfurter in as Chief of the court and that was the real beginning of the end of the Republic. The cause of socialism/communism is closely related to several issues. Religion which we learn when reading Marx is "The Opiate of the People" this being their accepted philosophy they are bound to oppose any religious God centered issues or organization. Sex because through the introduction of perversion and excessive sex man is taken away from the belief in God: "You can only serve one master at a time". "Free Trade" because it is closely related to internationalism. "Multiculturalism" because the issue of socialism is international in scope, and because to be successful in implementing their ideas they must first destroy home, family and community. This is accomplished through legal and illegal immigration to the tune of 24 million as of this article. Relentless wars of empire, of which we have Iraq, Afghanistan, Columbia, The Philippines, and troops in over 140 nations. The prime motive force of socialism/communism/liberalism since WWII has been through judicial interpretation on social issues confronting American society. The greatest force in this has been the Supreme Court. I do not believe that it is incorrect to say that 90% of the findings of the Supreme Court in their deliberations on constitutional issues have been personal opinions not based on law or the founding documents. This is wrong and all one has to do is to read the document. No place in the Constitution or Bill of Rights is there found any statement that justices are granted or authorized the right to base decisions based on personal opinion. In fact they are not even allowed to judge a legal case, as juries if so desired by the accused may adjudge all such cases involving over $ 20. What judges are allowed to do is to act as referees between defense and prosecution to run and manage the court systems, and to interpret the Constitution, Bill of Rights and Amendments thereto and any treaties as properly ratified by Constitutional mandate. The total failure of our Judiciary is best demonstrated in the NAFTA agreement. President Bill Clinton implemented NAFTA The North American Free Trade Act in the early 90s via an "Executive Order". It was called an agreement because the president 's staff was well aware that the privilege of making law is restricted to the legislative branch of government. The words Executive Order do not appear in any founding document and was never used by any president to implement a treaty. Prior to FDR all executive orders were used for the purchase of items required by the executive branch of government for their day-to-day operation. About four years ago the American Steel Workers in Birmingham Alabama brought a case against NAFTA before the federal Appellate court in Birmingham charging that the act (NAFTA) had been illegally implemented and should be struck down by the court. The Appellate court filed for the government so the case went to the Supreme Court. There is in my opinion no clearer case than this. The agreement had not been ratified by the states, implemented in violation of Article on Paragraph one of the constitution, and implemented by an EO which right the executive does not have. The court sidestepped the issue by stating that this was a legislative matter upon which congress must act. The phrase violation of duty comes to mind. By their act of silence on the issue they in fact endorsed the illegal act of a sitting president, violated their oath of office, violated the laws of the land and committed a wanton act of Judicial Marxism which will come to haunt the nation in future generations. |