When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own:
For he is a liar, and the father of it.
|
John VIII, 44 As a revisionist historian I know of no other issue as perverted as that of the CSA flag (Stars and bars), and the relentless war against its display by people and organization who have no idea of the actual issues relating to its history. The most vociferous opposition comes from Zionist and black so called 'civil rights" groups who represent the status quo of history relating to slavery.The symbolism of the flag by the way represents the cross of St. Andrew, which explains why one certain group is so opposed to it. Down here in Florida we have the same people oppose the Florida state flag on the very same grounds. It is also pertinent that the American federal flag in most cases has an eagle on top of the flagpole while the Confederate flag has a cross. The eagle is of course a hangover of the Roman symbol of empire, which does fit present circumstances better than the cross. For this reason there is an old popular Southern song titled, Down with the Eagle and up with the Cross. Unfortunately for the South a fact of history is that the victor writes the popularly accepted history, which in this case has purposely been distorted. Maligning southerners has become a media institution while portraying all of us as a group of morons is well in keeping with the Yankee Empire's controlled media. Hollywood as well as NY seems to spend more time degrading Southerners than any other wide-ranging issues. Since all mainstream media is under the control of Yankees it has become virtually impossible for any Southern patriot to counter this false propaganda, to do so results in the usual cry of racist and racism. Self-serving money-grubbing organizations like SPLC and JDL perpetuate these issues so that they can continue to raise funds to keep themselves in the rich abandon to which they have become so accustomed. If we cease to actively oppose these matters our children will grow up thinking that their parents and grandparents were vile ogres and stupid ones at that. It is worthwhile mentioning that the war of Northern Aggression had little to do with slavery and that Lincolns emancipation proclamation only freed slaves in the "states of rebellion" i.e. the confederacy in hope of causing a slave rebellion, which of course never took place. Slaves in the north were not freed by it. The fact that Southern slaves were far better treated than those in the north goes without mention. These liars never once mention the information that NYC had more slaves than the entire state of Georgia in 1840. The war was about northern industrial plutocrats desire to obtain by any means southern agrarian production for finacial gains, along with them as captive purchasers of Yankee manufacture, which was far inferior to the products of Europe that the South was accustomed to. The war was as all wars about economics and money not about slavery an issue that was only introduced by Lincoln after the anti-Lincoln anti-draft and anti-war NY rebellion that caused the loss of thousands of lives and required the transfer of many regiments of federal troops from the Southern war front to the metropolitan NYC area. Remember that the cause of the war was the blockading of all CSA ports by the federal government so as to prevent Southern farm producers from selling their products to the European markets. Sort of make one wonder if Iraq is a strategic repeat of these policies? Come to think of it Reconstruction looks a lot like what is now taking place in Iraq. It was the original plan of the plutocrats as implemented by Lincoln, for their man in Washington, to force the South to sell their production to the Yankee North at lower prices than they were able to get from Europe and to pay more for Yankee goods and thus expand Yankee markets around the world at the expense of the South. To these ends Lincoln so structured taxes, which at that time consisted primarily of import duties, so that Southern states paid for over 80% of federally collected taxes, while having a much smaller population base. One of the South's most successful ships was the CSS Alabama; she sank over 60 ships, she never once carried a slave even though she traveled the Atlantic from South Africa to Brazil and back to the CSA. NY and Boston Jews financed the slave trade for American flagged ships while British and Portuguese also Jews financed their ships, who also plied the slave trade of the Atlantic. Not one lone CSA flagged ship participated in the transport of a single slave. So historically those opposed to slavery should not be protesting the Southern Stars and Bars but the Union, Portuguese and British flags. Not one single Southern or later CSA ship was ever engaged in the slave trade. Slavery as well as its transport was primarily a Portuguese, British, and Spanish business To maintain Yankee control of the South, after the war the union instituted "reconstruction" which was the evil occupation and enslavement of the entire population of the South. Southerners who had been in CSA military service were not allowed to hold public office, vote, or to teach school. As this was before women's suffrage white southerners lost all their rights, which then resulted in the white backlash of the KKK. All southern states were separated into military districts with military control of the entire state bureaucracy. At the very same time amendments to the constitution were voted on and previously confederate states votes were not counted. Just like in Iraq. Yankee businessmen, the same plutocrats that brought about the war wound up owning the entire Southern infrastructure, railroads, shipping ports, wholesale and distribution. With that Southerners were no longer able to obtain the better quality of industrial products from Europe and were forced to purchase lower quality goods at higher prices from the Northern plutocrats. The fact that 95% of southerners of the CSA did not own any slaves has been widely misrepresented, but clearly proves the point that the war was not about slavery at all. Had slavery been the cause of the war Lee and Davis would not have been able to raise such a huge army of volunteers. The issue of many black soldiers in the army of the South is never addressed either. Furthermore the fact that the majority of the army of the Potomac was conscripts also supports that issue. In the over 100 years since the war of northern aggression not very much has changed. Like in the 1850's in 2006 the media is in the pockets of the same Yankees as is almost everything else. To optimize profit the focus has been altered to cheap goods from a purposely impoverished South to coolie labor from China imported by the K-marts', Wall-marts', Targets' etc. To keep control of the energy sector these very same people are sponsoring wars of aggression against Middle Eastern nations and installing the same sort of governance they did in the CSA at the end of that war. And the very same guys who financed and provided the slave trade are in charge of things now as they were then. To keep your eyes away from that reality they provide a handy symbol on which you can vex your anger, and that is the flag of the South. A. H. Krieg is an author one of his recent books in Vale the Illuminati and its plans for the future. |