Dr. A. H. Krieg CFMGE (6/07)
|
The environmentalist movement is part of a international cabal whose end goal is globalist control of society. Most Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) the author of Brave New World Clearly explained this ...A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers [bureaucrats] control population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. Environmentalism is an issue that allows the elite to create an aura of saving the planet and to make citizens happy to comply with their dictates. I.e. happy slaves. There is no global warming because there is no global climate! Dr.. Marcel Leroux (2003) If we examine a graph of temperatures from 1900 to 1995 a timeframe for which we have excellent evidentiary information we can see a 20-year pattern. This graph encompasses relative temperatures in, Godthaab, Greenland, Angmagssalik Greenland, Eastern Canada, and the Artic. Drawing a straight line through it's center we can clearly see a rise in temperature from 1925 to 1960 and fall in temperature beginning in 1960 and continuing through today. In fact the average temperature change from 1900 to 1995 is minus -2 deg C. The actual fact is that temperatures in Greenland and northeast Canada have been falling for the last 50 years. That is not to say that other regions of the world have not recorded some temperature rises. The last glacial age ended about 10,000 years ago at that time the glacial ice cap extended from the North Pole over Greenland and as far south as NYC and Chicago. The view that there is a global climate change that is caused by man is wrong. There are some similarities and on a worldwide scale temperatures have been rising for some time. This current rise in temperature, which is attributable to the sun, and the earth's relative position (obliqueness) and distance from it, is assumed to peak out in the year 4,600 or thereabout. This era began about 17,400 years ago. The current wisdom that man is responsible for this rise in temperature simply defies all logic. According to geologic and atmospheric scientifically available information over the past million years these ice-age temperate-age had durations of about 20,000 years, before that abut 41,000 years. Within these cycles there have been anomalies such as the mini medieval warm up and subsequent mini-ice-age that destroyed the Viking's Greenland settlements. The fallacy of the (IPCC) [UN] International Panel on Climate Change and their media and political allies is the supposition that climate behaves the same worldwide and equally on the entire surface of the planet and that man is responsible for these issues. This is patently wrong. This can easily be verified by examining locations on the same latitude on different continents. Montreal Canada per example is on the same latitude as Milan Italy and Seattle USA and Baghdad Iraq; I don't suspect anyone to be foolish enough to claim that these cities share similar climatic conditions. The entire IPCC scenario is based on the original KGB (5) misinformation that was intended to dorsal Western industrial prowess and production during the communist Soviet predominance in Russia. In sequences KGB computer climate models assumed a planet that was smooth as a billiard ball and had no mountains, and the second model had no oceans. Part of this KGB assault was on the West's nuclear industries. The Clam Shell Alliance (6) staged numerous protests in New England against operating reactors when the FBI stepped in they confiscated KGB provided staffing, guard schedules, building blue prints, with recommendations of best place to attack locations from Clamshell members. The fact of the matter is that some regions are warming and others are cooling. A worldwide assessment however indicates a minute gradual worldwide ongoing warming. All other considerations aside world climate is most strongly affected by the sun and solar activity. As such we see that climatic change for all of known history has followed a sinus rhythm of ice age and then climatic warming. This span of sinus waves of about 20 to 41 thousand years. Since our recorded history (written) only extends about 5,000 years we have very limited understanding of this issue, basing our scientific acumen on geologic information alone. To claim that man can seriously affect those issues is the concept of atheists who believe in mans omnipotence i.e. man is the wherewithal and most important creature in existence. Proof of this is that the largest by volume producer of CO2 is Yellowstone National Park in the United States at about 40,000 tones per year. Additionally termites produce the largest amount of CO2 exceeding mans meager output greatly. In fact mans total CO2 production rests below 5% of the total produced. So called "Greenhouse Gases" primarily CO2 absorb infrared rays produced by the sun. Infrared being the principle heat carriers of solar radiation. In fact as CO2 production increases plant life abounds producing more oxygen this balancing or if you prefer self-regulating climate. The minute about 4+% of CO2 gas produced by man has a negligible effect on global temperature. In regional understanding the North Atlantic region between the American Rocky Mountains and Western Europe the American continent is getting colder while the European northwest is warming. Obviously according to available records man does not cause global warming at all. There are various regions that seem to be warming and others that are cooling this are the direct result of global-position in relationship to the sun. A viable explanation of this situation relates to the fact that cooling comes from the Polar Regions while warming comes from the tropical ones. The Polar Regions radiate air masses we call Mobile Polar Anticyclone (MPA) these air masses move toward the tropical regions. In this process the cold air displaces the existing temperate air in North America and Canada causing a circulatory effect, which generates rain. This displaced air from the central plains in America that has been displaced by the Siberian Clipper (7) rotates to the north and from there to Western Europe causing warming. In essence while Norway and Scandinavia warms, Canada, the central plains of North America and the U. S. East coast is cooling. This cyclical change began in 1970's when it was noticed that western Greenland began to cool. This in fact is no new issue. The Vikings came to Greenland in the 12th century and farmed Greenland extensively. With the cooling beginning in the 13th century that brought about a mini ice age in Europe the Viking's all but gave up their Greenland colonization retreating to warmer climates. Evident of this fact is the weather as recorded on the top of Mt. Washington (6,288 Ft. 2,000m) in the presidential range of New Hampshire. This mountain records the worst climatic conditions of the world with a record wind chills and a wind force of well over 200 Mph; the highest wind speed recorded on Earth of 231 Mph and issues like eight feet of snow in three days. The average mean temperature is 27 Deg. F a summer heat wave will record 60 Deg. F. Temperature drops of 80+ Deg F in 6 hours are not uncommon. This is the Siberian Clipper at high altitude that then pushes the warmer air mass to Europe. Needless to say similar situations exist in Alaska as well as in Eurasia. Ice core data shows no carbon dioxide increase! Attempts to support the global warming thesis with analyses of carbon Dioxide content of air bubbles in glacial ice samples, are based on fudged data and ignorance of the physical process of glacial ice formation. Prof. Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski MD, Ph. D. D.Sc. Prior to Ozone Al Gore and the politization of climatic science when issues were not driven by political dogma the scientific concept was that climate altered between ice ages and interglacial ages on very long term cycles. These long cycles span average times of 100,000 years. Between these long cycles are the 10,000 to 40,000 year periods we call the interglacial periods. We are at the present time just past the middle of the end of one of these interglacial times and have either changed or are in the process of changing toward another colder period to begin in about 14 to 17,000 years from now. The earth orbit around the sun the sun's actions, continental tectonic action and volcanoes and the earth's axis tilt cause these cycles. Man does not, we are simply not that important in the realm of things. The suggestion that man's CO2 output has any remarkable effect on this solar system's planet's dictated cyclical warming and cooling condition is ludicrous. Likewise the growth of the ozone hole discovered by NASA four weeks prior to a legislative funding cycle of NASA was the cause de celebrant' to increase funding for NASA. This issue was brought for the sole reason that NASA desired increased funding so that their staff could continue to live in the gratuitous style they had become accustomed to. Ozone levels rise and drop in both Polar Regions due to the tilt of the world's axis and the prolonged winters, which retain the Polar Regions in total darkness for up to six months. Ozone is produced by solar radiation, which upon striking oxygen particles causes them to merge into a triad of oxygen that we call ozone. No sunlight no ozone. The only other way that ozone is produced in nature is by lighting, which is virtually non-existent in the Polar Regions. Sorry Al, you can change the environmental ideas politically but you cannot politically change scientific reality. If you had any science education at all you might possibly understand the issue. When reviewing the ice core samples of various drillings it becomes obvious that the related data was reported set on outcome based pre planned conclusions. In other words the required outcome was pre ordained by environmentalists who desired to report that man was the cause of climatic change so that they could implement their Malthusian plans of controlling all of man's functions. This is evidenced by an article entitled "Pathological Science" (8) as published by G. S. Callendar in 1938 who may be considered the father of the false man induced global warming scenario. The most revealing issue of ice core samples is that they were selectively picked so that they would meet the required outcome. In other words cores that by age or location disproved the CO2 hypothesis were ignored and those supporting the required outcome were included. The fact that no serious peer review by any disagreeing scientist on this issue has ever been allowed simply furthers the evidence that the provided information is tainted at worst and worthless at best. The proof that numbers are being skewed is in the reporting of CO2 core sample drillings in the artic. These samples originate from the North Polar Regions. They relate to air bubbles in ice core samples. Until 1985 various cores indicated a range of from 160 to about 700 ppmv and occasional samples of up to 2,450 ppmv. After 1985 all high readings disappeared from old reports and low readings from all new publications. In other words the fact were being manipulated through the propaganda process of omission. One example is the Neftel reported 1982 CO2 absorptions of pre-fossil-fuel existence demonstrating ice core samples from Antarctica of from 330 to 500 ppmv. A second report on the same samples issued in 1988 then reported the CO2 levels at 290 ppmv thus meeting the outcome goal of the global warming environmentalist scenario. They by design lowered the CO2 levels of pre- industrialized history so that they would be able to claim that increased CO2 levels caused by man were the reason for global warming. Thus allowing their demands for control of society. Not to be overlooked is the other Malthusian invention that we are running out of fossil fuels and must use "renewable energy resources". Firstly we are not running out of anything regardless of what inventions we are subjected to by the Club of Rome located in Paris France. These same Malthusian ideologues reported in the 70's that we would run out of copper, iron, gold and silver, in the 80's that we would all due to overpopulation starve to death by 2000, and that we would run out of fossil fuels in the 90's. In fact the Club of Rome has not made one single prediction that has come to reality. America has the largest deposits of anthracite (hard) coal. Enough coal to provide all carbon based energy and products for the next 600 years even factoring in population growth. In the 1930's Germany under the Nazis made coal liquefaction plants that produced, gasoline, kerosene, oil lubricants, greases, butter, aircraft fuel, and what have you. During the apartheid blockade of the South African Republic when all carbon-based fuels were blocked from South Africa built coal liquidation plants. These nine plants incorporated under the name Sassol still operate today producing a large percentage of South Africa's fossil fuel requirements at about $38. Per barrel. Why we in America continue to import oil at over $ 60 per barrel that we are proven able to domestically produce for $ 38. remains in my eyes a mystery, but it does fit in with the N.W.O. plan. This then brings us to the less than intelligent recent alcohol based fuel. Ethanol, which just to start with, produces 40% less energy than does gasoline. Therefore cars burning the proposed E85 fuel, which is 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline, will produce a reduced mileage per gallon of 34%. Furthermore in order to gain a 20% national befit through the use of E85 average car mileage on the road would have to be at least 50-MPG. Misleading claims as to the clean burning of ethanol include the claim that it is clean burning, which is not the case. Ethanol combustion is that of a hydrocarbon, which burns hydrogen thereby, sending an unattached carbon atom to the first available oxygen molecule, creating carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. Next is the production costs. First the government subsidizes the farmer to grow a crop, and provides the farmer fuel without tax. Second the farmer is compensated for the use of fertilizers to grow the crop. Third the farmer is induced to grow a specific crop at the loss of other crops and the natural increase in prices of the crops used. If you don't believe me just check the price of corn now and two years ago. Fourth the crop is transported to a still, which is subsidized by your taxes and stinks up about four square miles around the plant. Not to be omitted is the fact that to produce the by environmentalists requested amount of ethanol we would have to increase crop acreage by at least two million acres. By the time the entire cycle is complete the cost of the fuel is 30% higher than the imported fossil fuels (oil) and everyone loses, the consumer, the environment and the country. But worse yet is the result of producing ethanol out of corn (maize) in the United States. Corn is about half as productive as sugar cane, which is used in Brazil. But the real problem is already apparent. Corn prices are skyrocketing, today a dozen ears of corn cost what was paid for a bushel two years ago, however corn is the primary food used in cattle fattening in feed lots so beef prices are sharply rising, corn is the primary chicken food so poultry prices are rising pork is fed corn, and pork prices are rising. As the old saying goes for every action there is an opposite and equal reaction. George never had physics or chemistry in school so he is not aware of this, but then it's been years since George the lesser ever went grocery shopping. Finally ethanol is not ever likely to attain sufficient production to meet E85 national or even any individual state requirements. In order to offset 1% of our present oil consumption with ethanol we would need to increase tillable land usage in America by about one million acres, allowing for crop rotation that would have to be doubled. Political correctness and peer pressure are the motive forces of global warming fictions. A.H. K. In today's skewed world scientists just as all of us are subjected to the immense peer pressure of Cultural Maxims (CM) resulting in the sciences of huge mistakes and false results. CM is so prevalent in the scientific community that it is not uncommon for an atmospheric scientist to completely reverse his position. An example of this is one of the principal current prophets of global warming Dr. Stephen H. Schneider of the National Center of Atmospheric Research of Boulder Colorado. His recent claim is that global warming will cause the earth's atmosphere to rise in temperature of by +1.9 to +5.2 Deg. C. by 2100. But in 1971 he said quite the opposite, he said that global temperatures were destined to drop due to man induced pollution by -3.5 Deg. C. Likewise the National Science Board of the U.S. National Science Foundation stated in 1974 …."the present time of high temperatures should be drawing to an end….leading to an new glacial age". It seems irrelevant as to what will take place in the future, according to these twits no mater what happens it is evil man who is its cause. This will require big government intervention to prevent us from harming ourselves. People like Ozone Al Gore and Hillary Clinton are forever telling us that they know best. Al was another of those "C" student products; George the lesser at least did not get thrown out of college. We are you see flawed sinful and evil and only by reducing our population to under one billion will we be able to save the planet. Well, that according to the Club of Rome and Ozone Al. This one billion number has been widely circulated by the Club of Rome, The CFR. TC, Bilderbergers, The Roundtable, ACC, RIIA, WCC (10) among others. In consideration of over population these twits might consider that Japan close to the size of California and Arizona combined has a population of 124,460,000 while AZ & CA has 39,600,228 or about one third the amount. (10). Short time consequences like immediate warming or cooling over shorter time frames are cause by volcanic eruptions that in all cases exceed man's total output of pollutants by over 100 fold. El Nino which is caused by oceanic currents that are part of magnetic variations and deviations in ocean currents caused by sun action and tectonic heat and pressure movement, that explains El Nino. The fact that without the greenhouse effect, which has been part of nature since the dinosaurs, planetary temperature would average –16 Deg. C not the +13 Deg. C that exists is accepted by everyone. This greenhouse effect is caused by the absorption by some atmospheric gases of solar radiation, that penetrated the atmosphere and which is reflected back from the surface. It is also notable that the entire human CO2 atmospheric content is responsible for about 4% of the total greenhouse effect worldwide. Now considering that man's total attributed amount of CO2 accounts is less than 5% we can surmise that mans' impact is insignificant. So if we turn off every power plant, shut off every car, close every production plant and live in caves without heat or fire the total effect will be nothing!
|