|
I sincerely hope that none are so na•ve as to anticipate the return of our troops from Iraq, if so you had better think again. From Foreign Affairs the flagship quarterly of the CFR by reading between the lines we learn that Syria is to be our next target, after that we may anticipate Iran. It however is not just the CFR organ but individual statements made by prominent neo-cons that leads us to this conclusion. Historically we were more than just supportive of Syria's incursion into Lebanon, an act by the way that was sustained by the majority of Lebanese. Lebanese were just plain worn out by their civil war, in part supported by the Israelis military and financial support of the Druz militias. . We know this to be fact certain, because the information came from Secretary of State Rice. Every war needs a cause celebrant and we have found one in the murder of Hariri a Lebanese retired premiere, whose death is blamed on Syria. We have a reputable report from PHX news in Turkey that CIA Director. Porter Gross in his recent visit to Ankara informed the Turkish government that Iran already has nuclear weapons and that there might be a U.S. air strike against Iran. In the discussion with the Turks all the same Mossad fabrications came up that were used in Gulf War II; weapons of mass destruction, involvement with terrorists, and so forth. Support was requested from Turkey for air operations to possibly be mounted against Iran and Syria. One of the principle neo-con charges against Syria is that they have not secured the border between themselves and Iraq, and that scores of terrorists are infiltrating Iraq from Syria. This comes from a neo-con administration that does not secure our own southern border with Mexico and allows not a couple of hundred but millions of illegal immigrants, terrorist among them, into our own nation. Secretary Rice has gone the extra mile in stating publicly that the president does not need to go to congress for war with Syria because according to her the 9/11 resolution covers that matter. On those grounds we may well draw the conclusion that all future wars by any president in office no longer requires legislative approval as is outlined in the constitution. Words to the effect that Syria possesses weapons of Mass Destruction have already been unfurled; no doubt the Mossad will again provide all the false intelligence just as they did with Iraq. I think that the majority of Americans are gradually beginning to understand that these Middle East wars have little to do with us or with America and everything to do with Israel, whose hot potatoes we are taking out of the fire, time and again. After all, the closest part of America to the Middle East is 6000 miles away. Israeli foreign policy since the foundation of the mini empire in 1948 has been the zionist concept of "The Greater Israel". In fact this is why there has never been a successful peace in the Middle East. Arabs, as well as Palestinians both Christian and Muslim clearly understand that the long-term plan of Israel is the creation of the "Greater Israel". This consists of: Lebanon, Syria, West Bank, Palestine, the Sinai of Egypt, and Iraq to the Tigris River and north to the Turkish border. If we knew that Mexico had a firm plan of conquest of America, and was militarily supplied by France, we would most certainly have cause to be angry at both those nations. It can be surmised that all terrorist acts against America are seated in our lop-sided foreign policy in the Middle East. If we treated everyone equally and stopped supplying arms to Israel, the terrorism against us would stop instantly. Needless to say, this would also force Israel to come to peaceful accommodation with their neighbors. Zionist created myths declaring that we are hated because of our wealth, and the cause is envy, are preposterous. Likewise while people around the world are not exactly enthralled with our culture they would hardly commit suicide to register their disapproval. The Israeli lie that Israel is a democracy is most transparent when we examine Israel's laws, noting that just for starters all citizens must carry an ID card that states their religion. Israel is a socialist theocracy; any statement to the contrary is a lie. The next issue relates to the zionists statement that Israel is our only ally in the Middle East, that may now be the case, but before Israel we had no enemies in the Middle East. All this narrates to a new paradigm in American foreign policy which is not good. This change in policy, came about during the first Bush administration and was then expanded and institutionalized by Clinton and then Bush the lesser. This expansive policy is based on the false assumption that we have the right of pre-emptive military action against anyone our leaders feel to be in opposition to their policy. Actually that's their line, and it is not all-together true. What in fact the policy is, is that anyone who disagrees with the "free trade" policies of the "New World Order", will be punished by sanctions, and if that proves unsuccessful by regime change war. This policy was instituted at the behest of the multi-national cabal that as NGO's rules the roost at the CFR, State Department, and the UN. Previous foreign policy of the UN as well as America was that we would intervene militarily only if other nations or we ourselves were placed in jeopardy, and never in the internal affairs of any nation. Now under the guise of a veiled threat we have a new policy that they call "regime change". We are the bully who tells people all over the world, who they are allowed to elect and what the policy of their government is to be. In most cases we then appoint a procurator president, who is a puppet of America in power. We have done this in Haiti, Panama, Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan. And then we wonder why the world hates us, and why terrorists target America and Americans. The basic problem with these policies is that there is no moral ground for it. It completely violates over 200 years of American policy and procedure. It presumes to allow us the necessity to act as judge, jury, and executioner of those we disagree with. Who is to say that our form of governance is better than any other? As relating to freedom there are now with the inception of the Patriot Act FEMA and Homeland Security scores of nations that are freer than us. We may well dislike or even be disgusted by regimes like that of North Korea but that does not give us the right to attack North Korea. The same holds true for any number of nations. Furthermore our success in Iraq clearly shows that as of 2005 people in Iraq were better off under the rule of Saddam then they are now. Certainly the death rate, degree of violence, and social as well as religious tolerance was better before we came on the scene. Aside from moral issues, there are common sense concerns we seem to have completely overlooked. Facts are that Iraq is a nation that is located 6000 miles from its closest point to America, and posed no threat of any kind to us at any time. The war, Gulf II, was instituted on false information and lies, and for Duyu to bring daddies war to an equitable, to his opinion end. We have to date lost over 2000 of our soldiers, and had over 30,000 maimed, and an undisclosed number of "private contractors" i.e. mercenaries killed; frankly this is a waste. The issue that there was some sort of binding terrorist agreement with the government of Iraq proved to be a lie and the more recent issues of George the lesser that Iraq will turn into a haven for terrorists is based on George's personal worthless opinion and nothing else. Our treasury is as you read bleeding to death from the expense of these wars, over one trillion dollars to date. It is now more than obvious that in time a Shiite theocracy will develop in Iraq, which is the same as exists in Iran. The Israelis miss-calculated their entire scenario. What in fact in the long run will develop is a nation that is far more opposed to Israel than Saddam ever was. A secular government, as that under the Bath party, was the CIA's original reasoning for their support of Saddam as leader of Iraq. One assumes that this will mean another war by us and England to save Israel's bacon, no pun intended. The fact of the mater is that Israel is a socialist theocracy that would have come to amicable agreement with its neighbor's eons ago, if it were not for American and European foreign and military aid. To support their plans Israel's Mossad has produced enough false and fabricated information on issues relating to her neighbors to fill a 40 ft container. If one is careful to examine all these fabrications their source becomes very obvious. All the while AIPAC is busily disseminating all those fabrications on Capitol Hill, and the Houses of Parliament and a majority of our elected morons are buying it up hook line and sinker. To say as President Reagan did in his memoirs that America's Middle East policies are irrational is a major understatement. One can only wonder what he would say on the issue now? In my opinion our policies in the Middle East are stupid, and driven by a butch of Neo-Con zionists whose interests lie not with America but with Israel. American foreign policy should benefit America and none else. People whose allegiance to America is dubious at best, and whose parents were the NY Bolsheviks of the '30's should not control national policy. Neither should dual nationals who hold Israeli citizenship, of which we have scores in this administration. Organizations that claim to be public issue lobbyists but are in fact a single-issue lobby on behalf of a foreign nation like AIPAC should be forced to comply with the Foreign Agents Registration Act and to be prohibited from any lobbying on behalf of Israel, or political support of individual candidates for public office, just as all other nations do, this particularly in view, which give the impression of funds moving in two separate directions, from America and then back to America in the form of campaign contributions. Dr. A. H. Krieg is an author his books are available from all booksellers. Page URL: http://www.kriegbooks.com/syria.html Author hereby grants permission to e-mail this commentary, in its entirety and including the Web page URL, to those interested in receiving the information. Please e-mail for Adrian's PERMISSION in advance, to post, reprint, or reproduce this article for any other format of publication, electronic or otherwise. |
