First of all you must realize that this method of the political left, which is called egalitarianism is defined by the political left as "progressive" or "liberating" or "diversifying" when in reality it is a process utilized to unite a new class and to consolidate it at the cost of their adversaries. America's common culture since the "New Deal", our first real national exposure to socialism, is egalitarianism, which is the process of forcedly removing any class or social distinction between any of the present social, racial, political, or religious groups. Because we have nationally become such a dramatic force on the world stage, most nations, which we dominate either socially or politically or militarily, have become infected with the same processes. There are many ways in which this practice displays itself in society, perhaps better would be to say attacks the status quo of society to bring about the transformations desired by its proponents. That in my opinion the process, planned eventual outcome, as well as its immediate resulting social chaos is bad, goes without saying. There is nothing liberating, progressive or diversifying in the process of Cultural Marxism that the system operators have misnamed "political correctness". The cohesion by force of social bullying of those with differing ideology can in no way be considered liberation or be of any redeemable social value. The very places that should be immune to this, colleges, and universities are its most ardent supporters. This would be academic egalitarianism. In the environmental sphere we see it as the Marxist process for the domination of public property as well as state confiscation of private property. This was amply demonstrated during the Clinton administration in Utah. This is environmental egalitarianism. And so this process may be found judicially, legislatively, as well as in the executive branch of government. In business its great adherents are the multi-national corporation, who employ it for labor and cost control, and to force change in society so as to increase demand. A clear demonstration of environmental egalitarianism can be made through an examination of the process in Germany, a vassal of American political processes. The German environmental movement stems out of a coalition of several factions that now function under the name "Greens": [Die Gruenen] This coalition which now together with the Socialists rules Germany, is made up of the following social and political groupings. [Buentniss 90] Association 90 was the name of the communist (Party) controlled apparatus called the E. German environmental movement. This political faction was a communist party puppet organized for propaganda against the West. [Die Gruenen] the Greens was the W. German environmental party. [Die Bunten] The Colorful in literal translation (The Gay's) was the homosexual party of W. Germany. All these joined the coalition headed by Gerhard Schroeder of the Socialist party (SPD). Ample proof of this is demonstrated in the fact that the building that had housed Buentniss 90 also housed several Soviet offices as well as some Western environmental offices. This then concluded an association of the communist party, the socialist party, the environmentalists and the homosexuals, all under the same umbrella Socialist Party of Germany. This association may be assumed to be present in all of these egalitarianism procedures worldwide. The coalition of these forces to gain political dominance should be apparent to most outside observers, even if they find difficulty in articulating the process. There is ample rationale for the importance of the reader to understand this egalitarian ideology as the device of the elites to control society. One cannot oppose a system unless a clear and good understanding of it is achieved. This understanding will for the first time allow you to see this as a Marxist (communist) radical left movement which is imposing their will and desires on the general electorate, for the most part against their will. When per example phrases like, you are a racist, or you are an anti-Semite, or, don't you care about the environment, or you are a nazi, and others are used they should immediately raise a red flag. After all in any discussion that is hardly the point, its simply name-calling to hide an inability to confront a truth. Marxist groups per example frequently protest against racism, which they call, "a tool of capitalism". In reality that is not the case at all, if it were then the radical right, historical revisionists, and race statisticians would find themselves funded by the "captains of industry". As a revisionist historian let me assure you that this is not the case, in fact it is extremely difficult to have any text, article or book that strays from accepted historical dogma published anywhere. The shoe as it were is actually on the other foot. On the issue of race the Swedish economist Gunnar Mydal wrote a book called The American Dilemma some 1400 pages of mostly false egalitarian ideas about race. He was funded by a grant from the Carnegie Foundation for $ 300,000. No paltry sum. When Canadian Professor Rushton wrote Race Evolution and Behavior none funded him and the university where he was tenured tried to dismiss him. They did this not because of any error, falseness, plagiarism or any other error, no justification in the eyes of the university dean was simply the truth, which just happened to be in conflict with present racial dogma, which is based on speciousness and misconception. The fact of the matter is that the elites, the monied aristocracy are the very people funding this process. This naturally leads one to question their actions; after all we have been conditioned into believing that the monied interests want at all cost to maintain the status quo. This is a serious misnomer. Any clear understanding of economic principles leads one to understand that the key to consumption is change. In our present materialistic world change is the driving force for consumption of ever more useless junk, which the minions of advertising tell us what we need. This is decidedly what is behind the ever-increasing movement towards the substitution with new power centers replacing traditional ones. The clearest demonstration of this is Wall-mart the largest retail outlet in the world and its effect on medium sized cities into which they have moved. Traditional retail outlets go out of business in rapid succession, thereby changing the entire make up of the community. The case of Claremont NH comes to mind. Over 15 independent retail outlets went out of business within 12 moths of Wall-mart opening a store, after some success in drawing Vermonters to tax free New Hampshire they expanded the store into a super Wall-mart thereby destroying the rest of the independent retailers. That however is only the local Claremont impact, if we now go further we see that virtually every product sold in the new store is an import. This was not the case with the previous independent retailers who sold mostly domestically produced goods. Further examination leads on to scores of wholesalers that also went bust because Wall-mart acts as its own wholesaler, importer, thus they have destroyed an entire series of businesses. Someone who has lived through it all can easily explain social ramifications of these acts. Young people simply don't understand. Fifty years ago virtually all commerce was done at the local level, there were no chain stores with the exception of supermarkets, and a small number of big city department stores like Sears. The druggist or apothecary, the hardware store, the lumberyard, the haberdasher all were local people, you knew them, you met them at church or the club, they were all middle class retailers. They had values, they stood behind what they sold, and they gave credit. They were the heart and soul of the community. All that is gone, now the people are clerks, they are a number working for some shadowy monolith, they follow the rules, they do as told, they don't think-Heaven forbid thinking, self reliance, and reading the paper belong in the 20th century. This is the new age. A new feudalism run by an elite group of plutocrats whose fodder are consumers who work long hours holding two jobs to make ends meet. And if per chance the marriage goes sourer and resulted in a divorce than all the better, now two people are consuming even more and working two jobs each while the children are cared for and indoctrinated by the companion egalitarian state. In what is surely the strangest partnership of history we see a melding of two forces that had been opponents in all previous time. Egalitarianism certainly creates strange bedfellows. Through their introduction of a "Trojan Horse", which they call 'Free Trade" they have facilitated a major portion of their plan. While the political left agitates society to keep it in conflict, and the people's attention away from events, their ally globalist's implement the free trade hoax. Free trade allows the destruction of the middle class by empowering multi-national corporations to monopolize trade across borders as well as distribution. The changes enacted eliminate wholesalers, importers and exporters and small retailers. All these various jobs are incorporated within the multi-national corporation. They have thus accomplished one of their major goals of egalitarianism, the destruction of the middle class so hated by the communists as well as the plutocrats. While the left arduously agitates society with demonstrations the new elite industriously through legislation and international agreements and treaties, behind the scenes, implement the changes toward feudalism that they so desperately desire. These treaties are manifest in NAFTA, WTO, GATT, EC/EU and scores of international treaties and agreements, which are made part of our laws. Some implementations NAFTA by example were instituted illegally as an agreement. NAFTA was not ratified by the states and was implemented as an agreement through "Executive Order" a process instituted by the Executive branch in violation of the constitution's Article1 Section 1 Article II Section 2. Neither should the reader be surprised by all this for free trade was demonstrated to be a disaster when brought to use in England in the 19th century. The implementation of laws or their removal from the books is also no new occurrence. The original 13th Amendment to the constitution mysteriously disappeared during Lincoln's presidency having been published, ratified by the required 2/3rds majority and published on all issued copies prior to 1840. More recently the law prohibiting the use of Social Security numbers for any purpose other than those of the Social Security Administration mysteriously evaporated from the newly published law texts. This demonstrates that in a "democracy" anything is possible. It is at this juncture that the reader must be aware that America was conceived as a republic and that this is a decidedly different means of government from the much ballyhooed democracy that we hear of today. One of the changes required by the egalitarian elite is that exact change. While a republic is based on a set of laws, Constitution and Bill of Rights in our case, which dictates societal, social, and legal, intercourse, a democracy is fluid; it's laws subject to the whims of the majority. As Seneca so aptly put it, "The proof of bad law is the applause of the mob". Change is difficult and very slow in a republic but in a sinuous democracy change is not only inevitable but also constant. This very change offers the ruling class yet another opportunity of power. Through the continuous change in law, citizens are unable to follow its confusing deliverance and thereby give police authority the opportunity of selective enforcement. This evil process allows the capricious arrest of citizens for violations of law that they cannot understand and in many cases are unaware of. Ignorance of the law not being an accepted excuse of its violation. Diversity in race, culture, and social contrivance is now credited as the greatest advance in society over all of man's history. This is the concept that a mutt is superior to a thoroughbred. It is wrong and it is stupid and there is not a single racial group human or animal, which conforms to it. Multiculturalism is nothing more than the destruction of all of man's past experience and accomplishments. The social theory as exposed by Myrdal is a bankrupt 19th century communist means of disrupting and eliminating the status quo of society. When we breed racehorses do we mix plow horses with Arabians? When we breed dogs do we improve the breed by mixing St. Bernard's with Beagles? When we breed cattle do we mix water buffaloes with Herefords? Let's face facts - humans are animals, and as such not all so different from the aforementioned animals. If we examine this further we see that by inherent selective breeding nature ensures the survival of sub species in that they do not interbreed with others that are unlike themselves. This concept of multiculturalism is another of the hydra of egalitarianism in service of the elite. Now anyone who does not agree with my understanding of this issue has the option of providing a list of elites who themselves conform to the multiculturalism. It is a fact that there are modern societies that not only frown on this practice but also in fact religiously outlaw it, it is interesting to note that they are exactly the ones who are the greatest supporters of the process as is illustrated in the introduction to this essay. Lastly is the very atypical idea that egalitarianism is liberating. In an accurate understanding egalitarian means equal. Equality is touted by today's sophist edu-crats as the great liberating item of the new century. This concept began its torturous journey in the late 19th century when a concept was publicly introduced that our republic was based on the idea of social equality. This is not the case. The introduction of this process stems from 1779 and the Illuminati, whose founder Adam Weishaupt is the originator of the ten communist principles that were at the turn of the 20th century plagiarized by Karl Marx in his Das Komunistische Manifest Arbeiter Der Welt Fereinigt Euch published in German but in London England. The equality of our laws, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Federalist Papers is Equality before the Law. This is very different from social equality. What our forefathers conceived is that in law all parties in any bearing before it must be considered equal, this is and was just and in keeping with religious and social behavior of that time. I strongly support this concept, for without it we live in a barbarous society. The corruption of this by the egalitarians into the concept of equality in all is ridiculous in its idea. What they in fact are trying to say is that men and women are the same that Caucasoid; Mongoloid and Negroid races are identical, and that interbreeding between those groups is nature's natural plan. If that were really the case why did these racial groups develop on different continents? If they are correct why are there over 40 different characteristics between those very groups? If that were correct why is it that the Mongoloids are more intelligent than the Caucasoid or Negroid. If that is the case why are Negroes' bones heavier, and why is their cranial cavity smaller? We are not equal, and anyone who claims we are is lying. That does not necessarily mean that one is better than another, certainly not before the law, but it most certainly means that we are not socially, physically, or intellectually equal. Opposition to egalitarianism is tenuous at best. The reason being that the proponents of it simply ignores any factual or realistic opposition with personal slur attacks against their opposition. They resort to name-calling. When they per example call you a nazi, reply, "than means little coming from a egalitarian communist". The normal basis of a well-founded pragmatic scientific and truthful opposition in such circumstance is rendered ineffective. The only possible avenue remaining is the exposure of opposition as the small-minded bigots they in reality are. It is necessary to lucidly demonstrate the economic thrust of the process, as well as its impending goal. When they commence with their name-calling tactic expose their fraudulent arguments for what they are, simple slander in effort to discredit the truth. When they refuse to reply to a scientific or proven fact, demand that they do so and demand that they either prove the fact false or relinquish the issue point. By demonstrating the Cultural Marxist theme, or the Free Trade fallacy your chance of exposure providing you are given the opportunity is very effective. We must all understand that this is not a level playing field, and that more often than not when confronted with damaging evidence against their cause they resort to shouting down the opposition. Such is the un-civil 21st century. I would in closing like to have the reader understand that egalitarianism is the communist process used to bulldoze society into the new age planned by the elite. Furthermore that this process is injurious to all races and genders, and serves the one purpose of the plutocratic elites. That the culmination of this process is a feudalistic society in which a plutocratic elite is in control of governance. That this plan will eliminate any direct democracy, and the process of voting for direct representation. In the planned system the electorate will be given the opportunity to select a chosen by the elites representative that will elect the bureaucrat administrator who manages the society on behalf of the elite. If you doubt this look at the EU and the people in Brussels none of whom are elected by anyone, all being appointed. All this for the Brave New World of the New World Order. Page URL: http://www.kriegbooks.com/understanding_21st_century.html |